 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
 |
|
The second professional seminars on quality facility management services for modern corporations have been successfully held on 11 & 18 November 2003 at the Plaza Conference Centre by the Hong Kong Institute of Facility Management (HKIFM) with the theme of Facility Performance Measurements. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The HKIFM is very honoured to have 2 keynote speakers, Mr Tan Teng Hee and Dr Danny S S Then, to explore their work done recently on performance measurements in relation to the build assets. A number of senior managers, engineers and building surveyors from government-related bodies and private sectors participated and exchanged their experiences with each others. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Photo Album:
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Keynote and Plenary Speakers |
| Seminar 1 - 11 November 2003 (Tuesday) |
|
Mr. Tan Teng Hee Manager, Asset Management Research and Development Branch Department of Public Works, Queensland
Building Assets - Managing Cost and Value
Performance concepts in relation to build asset have moved from an emphasis on economy and efficiency to include other aspects of performance. This paradigm shift towards a more balanced approach supports the drive to manage both cost and value in the acquisition and use of build asset.
Mr Tan presented a new approach to manage both cost and value and outlined some of the existing and proposed key performance indicators and performance frameworks. |
 |
 |
|
| Seminar 2 - 18 November 2003 (Tuesday) | |
|
Dr. Danny S. S. Then PhD, MSc, Bsc (Hons), F.PFM, MBIFM, MCIOB, MCMI Associate Professor, Department of Building Services Engineering, Programme Leader, Graduate Programme in Facility Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Unpacking Performance Measurements for Building Assets - Concepts and Issues Performance Benchmarking is currently 'hot topic' in conversations within professional circles of both private and public sector organizations. The philosophy behind performance benchmarking is comparative analysis with an emphasis on 'analysis', not meaningless numerical comparison with a bias towards positioning within 'league tables'. Dr Then unpacked the components required for performance monitoring and discuss some of the key issues that need to be resolved internally by an organization before the process of external benchmarking can be of value. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
||
               
|
|
||
Report
of seminars on Facility Performance Measurements
